Home View Shopping Cart Contact Us Home
Subscribe to Drafting Zone
Drafting Practices and StandardsGeometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing Study ZoneTips & ToolsInspection GuidesAsk Gary WhitmireConfiguration data management advisories
Ask Gary Whitmire

In this area of the Drafting Zone website, Subscribers can communicate specific questions about mechanical drafting standards and practices to the Zone's Technical Director, Gary Whitmire. Gary will review your question and respond accordingly, if possible. When Gary provides an answer to your question, you will receive an email informing you that Gary's response has been posted to the website. In the event that he is unable to answer a question, you will receive an email notification. As a rule of thumb, Gary will only provide responses to questions that can be answered in fewer than 100 words. Although only Drafting Zone Subscribers are able to submit questions, Guest Members can browse and search all questions and answers.


Resource Locked Browse Answers | Resource Locked Search Answers | Resource Locked Post New Question

Most Recent Question

Q: Dear Gary, By definition, the primary datum plane requires a minimum of 3 points of contact. Let us assume that the flatness tolerance on a cube-shaped part is rather loose--let's say .100 inches. Many times, the part would be placed on the datum simulator and quality control would proceed without a question. However, since the flatness tolerance is so loose, it would be feasible to have a noticeable high spot on the cube’s primary datum plane that is directly below the part’s center of mass, causing the part to possess more than one “stable” position — a “teeter-totter” situation, if you will. The quality engineer might place the part on the datum simulator to achieve 3 points of contact. However, he might place it down a second time and achieve 3 different points. If the part can acquire stability in multiple orientations, how would you determine which 3 points of contact to use to define your datum feature plane? If the answer is to use the secondary and tertiary datum planes to assist, what if those are not defined? Thanks Gary!
A: 1. The standard states that if the part wobbles it may be adjusted to an optimum position, if necessary, to simulate the datum. 2. The drawing could also state datum targets. 3. Tighten up the flatness tolerance. 4. Level the surface in three places to the inspection table to simulate the assembly condition. 5. Let the CMM level the surface with best fit condition.
Log In

Home
Home
About Drafting Zone
Subscribe to Drafting Zone
Guest Room
Meet the Experts
FAQ
Shopping Zone
Contribute
Resources
Contact Us